Corte di giustizia UE n. 1049/2020

62019CJ0669_INF Judgment of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 16 September 2020 – BP v FRA (Case C‑669/19 P) ( 1 ) (Appeal – Non-contractual liability – Access to documents – Protection of personal data – Allegedly irregular disclosure of such data – Regulations (EC) No 1049/2001 and No 45/2001 – Admissibility of pleas and offers of evidence before the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Allocation of costs) 1. Judicial proceedings – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Conditions – Plea based on matters which have come to light in the course of the procedure – Late submission of the application to introduce a new plea in law – Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Art. 84(1) and (2)) (see paras 14-16, 20-23) 2. Appeals – Pleas in law – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFUE; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 169(2)) (see paras 26, 27) 3. Actions for damages – Application – Lack of precision as regards the extent of the damage – Admissibility – Conditions – Allegation by the applicant of facts justifying that omission (Art. 340, second para., TFEU) (see para. 39) 4. Judicial proceedings – Production of evidence – Time limit – Evidence lodged out of time – Conditions (Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Art. 85(1), (2) and (4)) (see para. 41) 5. Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted – Failure to observe the rules of evidence – Question of law amenable to judicial review on appeal (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 42) 6. Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted – Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 63, 64) 7. Appeal – Grounds – Plea directed against the decision of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on costs – Inadmissible where all other pleas are rejected (Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58, second para.) (see para. 84) Operative part [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: 1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. Orders BP to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] for [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (FRA). ( 1 ) OJ C 383, 11.11.2019 .