Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2022

ECLI:EU:T:2022:374
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA])

13 June 2022( * ) (Rectification)

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]834/17,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA], Inc., established in Atlanta, Georgia ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by A. Ryan, Solicitor, F. Hoseinian, W. Knibbeler, A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and F. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], lawyers, applicant, v

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and H. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as Agents, defendant, APPLICATION under Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the unlawfulness of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2013) 431 of 30 January 2013 declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] COMP/M.6570 – UPS/TNT Express),

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]),

composed of S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], R. da [OSCURATO:PERSONA], I. Reine, L. Truchot and M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Rapporteur), [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. Coulon, makes the following

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment on 23 February 2022,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

v

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

(T-834/17, ECLI:EU:T:2022:84).

2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], it is necessary to rectify a clerical mistake found in the introductory part of that judgment, in the name of one of the representatives of the defendant. On those grounds,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA])

hereby orders: The introductory part of the judgment should read ‘[OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and H. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as Agents’ instead of ‘[OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and R. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as Agents’.

Luxembourg, 13 June 2022.

E. Coulon

S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

* Language of the case: English.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 13 June 2022( * ) (Rectification) [OSCURATO:PERSONA]834/17, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Inc., established in Atlanta, Georgia ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by A. Ryan, Solicitor, F. Hoseinian, W. Knibbeler, A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and F. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], lawyers, applicant, v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and H. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as Agents, defendant, APPLICATION under Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the unlawfulness of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2013) 431 of 30 January 2013 declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] COMP/M.6570 – UPS/TNT Express), [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], R. da [OSCURATO:PERSONA], I. Reine, L. Truchot and M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Rapporteur), [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. Coulon, makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment on 23 February 2022, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (T-834/17, ECLI:EU:T:2022:84). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], it is necessary to rectify a clerical mistake found in the introductory part of that judgment, in the name of one of the representatives of the defendant. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: The introductory part of the judgment should read ‘[OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and H. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as Agents’ instead of ‘[OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, P. Berghe, M. Farley and R. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as Agents’. Luxembourg, 13 June 2022. E. Coulon S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] * Language of the case: English.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2022 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris