Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenzaDecisione del 14 ottobre 2019

Corte di giustizia UE n. 966/2020

ECLI:EU:C:2020:734
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62019CJ0623_INF

Judgment of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 17 September 2020 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v Commission (Case C‑623/19 P) ( 1 ) (Appeal – Action for annulment – Decision to recover a debt – Enforcement order – Principle of res judicata – Adoption of a decision which is enforceable within the meaning of Article 299 TFEU for the recovery of grants awarded under a contract – Grant agreement concluded under the Competitiveness and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (CIP) (2007–2013))

1. Appeal – Formal requirements – The name and address of the applicant – Objective (Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 168(1)(a)) (see paras 27, 28)

2. Procedure – Res judicata – Scope (see paras 37, 38)

3. Judicial proceedings – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] seised under an arbitration clause – Jurisdiction of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Scope – Prohibition on ruling ultra petita – Obligation to comply with the framework of the dispute as defined by the parties (Art. 272 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 76 and 84(1)) (see paras 40, 41)

4. EU budget – EU financial assistance – Obligation on the beneficiary to comply with the conditions for grant of the assistance – Justification of costs incurred – Proceedings by the Commission for recovery of advances paid – Recovery of the financing of costs considered ineligible (Art. 317 TFEU; [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 966/2012, Art. 135) (see paras 49-52)

5. Action for annulment – Pleas in law – Misuse of powers – Concept (Art. 263 TFEU) (see para. 76)

6. Commission – Powers – Implementation of the EU budget – Debts to the EU arising from a contract made by an institution – Recovery by an enforceable decision – Power to adopt such a decision in the context of contractual relations – Legal basis – Contractual origin of the claim – Not relevant (Art. 299 TFEU; [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 966/2012, Art. 79(2)) (see para. 77)

7. EU law – Principes – Protection of legitimate expectations – Conditions (see para. 84) Operative part

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]:

1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Sistemas de computadores, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Lda to pay the costs. ( 1 ) OJ C 348, 14.10.2019 .

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62019CJ0623_INF Judgment of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 17 September 2020 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v Commission (Case C‑623/19 P) ( 1 ) (Appeal – Action for annulment – Decision to recover a debt – Enforcement order – Principle of res judicata – Adoption of a decision which is enforceable within the meaning of Article 299 TFEU for the recovery of grants awarded under a contract – Grant agreement concluded under the Competitiveness and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (CIP) (2007–2013)) 1. Appeal – Formal requirements – The name and address of the applicant – Objective (Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 168(1)(a)) (see paras 27, 28) 2. Procedure – Res judicata – Scope (see paras 37, 38) 3. Judicial proceedings – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] seised under an arbitration clause – Jurisdiction of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Scope – Prohibition on ruling ultra petita – Obligation to comply with the framework of the dispute as defined by the parties (Art. 272 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 21; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 76 and 84(1)) (see paras 40, 41) 4. EU budget – EU financial assistance – Obligation on the beneficiary to comply with the conditions for grant of the assistance – Justification of costs incurred – Proceedings by the Commission for recovery of advances paid – Recovery of the financing of costs considered ineligible (Art. 317 TFEU; [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 966/2012, Art. 135) (see paras 49-52) 5. Action for annulment – Pleas in law – Misuse of powers – Concept (Art. 263 TFEU) (see para. 76) 6. Commission – Powers – Implementation of the EU budget – Debts to the EU arising from a contract made by an institution – Recovery by an enforceable decision – Power to adopt such a decision in the context of contractual relations – Legal basis – Contractual origin of the claim – Not relevant (Art. 299 TFEU; [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 966/2012, Art. 79(2)) (see para. 77) 7. EU law – Principes – Protection of legitimate expectations – Conditions (see para. 84) Operative part [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: 1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Sistemas de computadores, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Lda to pay the costs. ( 1 ) OJ C 348, 14.10.2019 .
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE n. 966/2020 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris