Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE n. 2022/2026

ECLI:EU:T:2026:556
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62024TO0357(01) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], sitting with five Judges) 10 September 2026 ( *1 ) (Rectification)

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑357/24,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] AS,

established in Oslo ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by M. English, S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and L. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], lawyers, applicant, v

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by M. Mataija, I. Naglis and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by

[OSCURATO:PERSONA].,

established in Redmond, Washington ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by L. Kjølbye, J. Wileur, L. Bitsakou, T. Milleville and A. Aubry, lawyers, intervener, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], sitting with five Judges), composed, at the time of deliberations, of M. van der [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], G. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], D. Petrlík (Rapporteur), K. Kecsmár and S. Kingston, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: S. Spyropoulos, Administrator, makes the following

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] gave the judgment of 2 September 2026, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑357/24 , EU:T:2026:520 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], it is necessary to rectify a clerical mistake found in paragraph 1 of that judgment.

On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], sitting with five Judges) hereby orders: In paragraph 1 of the judgment, ‘By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AS, seeks annulment in part of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2024) 806 final of 12 February 2024 closing the market investigation opened by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2023)6078, pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Cases DMA.100015 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online search engines, DMA.100028 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – web browsers and DMA.100034 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online advertising services) (‘the contested decision’).’ must be read instead of ‘By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AS, seeks annulment in part of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2024) 806 final of 12 February 2024 closing the market investigation opened by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2023)6078, pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Cases DMA.100015 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online search engines, DMA.100028 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – web browsers and DMA.100034 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online advertising services) (‘the contested decision’).’ Luxembourg, 10 September 2026.

V. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

M. van der [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62024TO0357(01) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], sitting with five Judges) 10 September 2026 ( *1 ) (Rectification) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑357/24, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AS, established in Oslo ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by M. English, S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and L. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], lawyers, applicant, v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by M. Mataija, I. Naglis and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by [OSCURATO:PERSONA]., established in Redmond, Washington ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by L. Kjølbye, J. Wileur, L. Bitsakou, T. Milleville and A. Aubry, lawyers, intervener, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], sitting with five Judges), composed, at the time of deliberations, of M. van der [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], G. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], D. Petrlík (Rapporteur), K. Kecsmár and S. Kingston, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: S. Spyropoulos, Administrator, makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] gave the judgment of 2 September 2026, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑357/24 , EU:T:2026:520 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], it is necessary to rectify a clerical mistake found in paragraph 1 of that judgment. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], sitting with five Judges) hereby orders: In paragraph 1 of the judgment, ‘By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AS, seeks annulment in part of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2024) 806 final of 12 February 2024 closing the market investigation opened by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2023)6078, pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Cases DMA.100015 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online search engines, DMA.100028 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – web browsers and DMA.100034 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online advertising services) (‘the contested decision’).’ must be read instead of ‘By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AS, seeks annulment in part of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2024) 806 final of 12 February 2024 closing the market investigation opened by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2023)6078, pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Cases DMA.100015 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online search engines, DMA.100028 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – web browsers and DMA.100034 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – online advertising services) (‘the contested decision’).’ Luxembourg, 10 September 2026. V. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] M. van der [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE n. 2022/2026 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris