Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2020

ECLI:EU:T:2020:174
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62014TO0449(01)

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA])

4 May 2020 ( *1 ) (Rectification)

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑449/14,

[OSCURATO:SOCIETA]

, established in Courbevoie ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), and

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] SA

, established in Courbevoie, represented by G. Forwood, lawyer, M. Powell, A. Rogers and A. Oh, Solicitors, applicants, v

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

, represented by C. Giolito and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents, and by B. Doherty, Barrister, defendant, APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] AT.39610 — Power cables) in so far as it concerns the applicants and, in the alternative, a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]),

composed of A. M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], M. Kancheva (Rapporteur) and R. Barents, Judges,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA],

makes the following

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment of 12 July 2018, [OSCURATO:SOCIETA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑449/14 , EU:T:2018:456 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, a clerical mistake found in paragraph 156 of that judgment.

On those grounds,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA])

hereby orders: In paragraph 156 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, it must be read ‘It is sufficient that, as in the present case, the proportion of the value of sales to be taken into consideration is justified by other factors capable of influencing the determination of gravity pursuant to that provision […]’ instead of ‘It is sufficient that the proportion of the value of sales to be taken into consideration is justified by other factors capable of influencing the determination of gravity pursuant to that provision […]’.

Luxembourg, 4 May 2020.

E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

A. M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

( *1 ) Language of the case: English.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62014TO0449(01) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 4 May 2020 ( *1 ) (Rectification) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑449/14, [OSCURATO:SOCIETA] , established in Courbevoie ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] SA , established in Courbevoie, represented by G. Forwood, lawyer, M. Powell, A. Rogers and A. Oh, Solicitors, applicants, v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , represented by C. Giolito and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents, and by B. Doherty, Barrister, defendant, APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] AT.39610 — Power cables) in so far as it concerns the applicants and, in the alternative, a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of A. M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], M. Kancheva (Rapporteur) and R. Barents, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment of 12 July 2018, [OSCURATO:SOCIETA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑449/14 , EU:T:2018:456 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, a clerical mistake found in paragraph 156 of that judgment. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: In paragraph 156 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, it must be read ‘It is sufficient that, as in the present case, the proportion of the value of sales to be taken into consideration is justified by other factors capable of influencing the determination of gravity pursuant to that provision […]’ instead of ‘It is sufficient that the proportion of the value of sales to be taken into consideration is justified by other factors capable of influencing the determination of gravity pursuant to that provision […]’. Luxembourg, 4 May 2020. E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] A. M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2020 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris