Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2013

ECLI:EU:F:2013:206
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62012FO0078_EN

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] part

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] F‑78/12,

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to Article 106a thereof, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], an official of the Council of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], residing in Rhode-Saint-Genèse (Belgium), represented by M. Velardo, lawyer, applicant, v Council of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by J. Herrmann and M. Bauer, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and Court of Auditors of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented initially by T. Kennedy, N. Scafarto and K. Zavřelová, acting as Agents, and subsequently by N. Scafarto, acting as Agent, interveners,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA])

composed of K. Bradley (Rapporteur), President, H. Kreppel and M.I. Rofes i Pujol, Judges, Registrar: W. Hakenberg, makes the following

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

1. On 29 April 2015, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) delivered its judgment in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v Council (F‑78/12, EU:F:2015:37).

2. The headwords of the judgment contain an obvious clerical error within the meaning of Article 122(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

As such a clerical error does not concern the operative part or one of the grounds constituting the necessary support for the operative part, the judgment should be rectified of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA]’s own motion, in accordance with the instructions given in the operative part of this order. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] part On those grounds,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA])

hereby orders:

1. In the headwords of the judgment of 29 April 2015 in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v Council (F‑78/12, EU:F:2015:37), the reference to the Framework agreement concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP shall be amended as follows: ‘on fixed-term work’.

2. The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of the order shall be made in the margin of the original of the judgment. Luxembourg, 13 May 2015.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62012FO0078_EN [OSCURATO:PERSONA] part [OSCURATO:PERSONA] F‑78/12, ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to Article 106a thereof, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], an official of the Council of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], residing in Rhode-Saint-Genèse (Belgium), represented by M. Velardo, lawyer, applicant, v Council of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by J. Herrmann and M. Bauer, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and Court of Auditors of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented initially by T. Kennedy, N. Scafarto and K. Zavřelová, acting as Agents, and subsequently by N. Scafarto, acting as Agent, interveners, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) composed of K. Bradley (Rapporteur), President, H. Kreppel and M.I. Rofes i Pujol, Judges, Registrar: W. Hakenberg, makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1. On 29 April 2015, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) delivered its judgment in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v Council (F‑78/12, EU:F:2015:37). 2. The headwords of the judgment contain an obvious clerical error within the meaning of Article 122(1) of the Rules of Procedure. As such a clerical error does not concern the operative part or one of the grounds constituting the necessary support for the operative part, the judgment should be rectified of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA]’s own motion, in accordance with the instructions given in the operative part of this order. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] part On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: 1. In the headwords of the judgment of 29 April 2015 in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v Council (F‑78/12, EU:F:2015:37), the reference to the Framework agreement concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP shall be amended as follows: ‘on fixed-term work’. 2. The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of the order shall be made in the margin of the original of the judgment. Luxembourg, 13 May 2015.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2013 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris