Fons Iuris
Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE n. 2017/2026

ECLI:EU:T:2026:477
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 16 July 2026 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v EUIPO – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) (Case T ‑ 839/25) ( EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Absolute ground for invalidity – Procedure before the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law )

1. EU law – Principles – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the defence – Right to be heard – Scope (Charter of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Art. 41(2)(a)) (see paragraphs 19, 20)

2. EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Decisions of EUIPO – Observance of the rights of the defence – Scope of the principle (Charter of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Art. 41(2)(a); [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2017/1001, Art. 94(1), second sentence) (see paragraph 21)

3. EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Restitutio in integrum – Conditions under which applicable – Restrictive interpretation ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2018/625, Art. 16(1)) (see paragraph 29)

4. EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Restitutio in integrum – Applicability to the prescribed time limit for paying appeal fees ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2017/1001, Art. 105(1)) (see paragraph 35)

5. EU trade mark – Decisions of EUIPO – Obligation to inform the parties of the judicial remedies available and of the time limits – None ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2017/1001, Art. 105(1)) (see paragraphs 41, 42) Operative part 1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AG shall pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AG.

3. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 16 July 2026 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v EUIPO – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) (Case T ‑ 839/25) ( EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Absolute ground for invalidity – Procedure before the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law ) 1. EU law – Principles – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the defence – Right to be heard – Scope (Charter of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Art. 41(2)(a)) (see paragraphs 19, 20) 2. EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Decisions of EUIPO – Observance of the rights of the defence – Scope of the principle (Charter of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], Art. 41(2)(a); [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2017/1001, Art. 94(1), second sentence) (see paragraph 21) 3. EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Restitutio in integrum – Conditions under which applicable – Restrictive interpretation ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2018/625, Art. 16(1)) (see paragraph 29) 4. EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Restitutio in integrum – Applicability to the prescribed time limit for paying appeal fees ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2017/1001, Art. 105(1)) (see paragraph 35) 5. EU trade mark – Decisions of EUIPO – Obligation to inform the parties of the judicial remedies available and of the time limits – None ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2017/1001, Art. 105(1)) (see paragraphs 41, 42) Operative part 1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. 2. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AG shall pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] AG. 3. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.