Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2019

ECLI:EU:T:2019:196
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA])

21 March 2019 ( * ) (Rectification)

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑559/15 REC,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

established in Tehran ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by D. Luff, lawyer, applicant, v Council of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by B. Driessen and M. Bishop, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by F. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and R. Tricot, acting as Agents, intervener,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]),

composed of I. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Rapporteur), [OSCURATO:PERSONA], V. Valančius, P. Nihoul, J. Svenningsen and U. Öberg, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. Coulon, makes the following

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered the judgment of 13 December 2018,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

v Council

(T‑559/15, EU:T:2018:948).

2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, obvious inaccuracies found in paragraph 49 of that judgment.

On those grounds,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA])

hereby orders: In paragraph 49 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, it must be read ‘… the Council takes the view that …’ instead of ‘… the Council, supported by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], takes the view that …’. Luxembourg, 21 March 2019. E. Coulon

I. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

* Language of the case: English.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 21 March 2019 ( * ) (Rectification) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑559/15 REC, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], established in Tehran ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by D. Luff, lawyer, applicant, v Council of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by B. Driessen and M. Bishop, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by F. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and R. Tricot, acting as Agents, intervener, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of I. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Rapporteur), [OSCURATO:PERSONA], V. Valančius, P. Nihoul, J. Svenningsen and U. Öberg, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. Coulon, makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered the judgment of 13 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v Council (T‑559/15, EU:T:2018:948). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, obvious inaccuracies found in paragraph 49 of that judgment. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: In paragraph 49 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, it must be read ‘… the Council takes the view that …’ instead of ‘… the Council, supported by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], takes the view that …’. Luxembourg, 21 March 2019. E. Coulon I. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] * Language of the case: English.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2019 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris