Fons Iuris
Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2020

ECLI:EU:C:2020:439
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62019CO0554_INF

Order of the Court ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 4 June 2020 – FU (Case C‑554/19) ( 1 ) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (EU) 2016/399 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] borders code – Articles 22 and 23 – Abolition of internal border controls in the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] area – Checks within the territory of a [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Measures having an effect equivalent to border checks – Identity checks in the vicinity of an internal border of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] area – Possibilities of checks irrespective of the behaviour of the person concerned or of the existence of specific circumstances – National framework concerning the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks)

1. Border controls, asylum and immigration – Community code on movement across borders – Abolition of border control at internal borders – Checks within the territory – National legislation conferring on the police authorities the power to check the identity of any person within an area of 30 kilometres from the land border of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] concerned with [OSCURATO:PERSONA] parties to the Convention implementing the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Admissibility – Conditions – Verification by the national court (Art. 67(2) TFEU; [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2016/399, Arts 22 and 23) (see paras 26, 27, 38, 40, 53-57, operative part)

2. Preliminary rulings – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Examination of the compatibility of national law with EU law – Not included – Providing the national court with full guidance on the interpretation of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] law – Included (Art. 267 TFEU) (see paras 28-31) Operative part: Article 67(2) TFEU and Articles 22 and 23 of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (EU) 2016/399 of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of 9 March 2016 on a [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) must be interpreted as not precluding a national legislative provision which confers on the police authorities of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] in question the power to check the identity of any person, within an area of 30 kilometres from that [OSCURATO:PERSONA] land border with other [OSCURATO:PERSONA], with a view to preventing or terminating unlawful entry into or residence in the territory of that [OSCURATO:PERSONA] or preventing certain criminal offences which undermine the security of the border, irrespective of the conduct of the person concerned or the existence of specific circumstances, provided that that power is framed by sufficiently detailed specifications and limitations on the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks carried out, thereby guaranteeing that the practical exercise of that power cannot have an effect equivalent to border checks, which is, however, a matter for the referring court to verify. ( 1 ) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019 .

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62019CO0554_INF Order of the Court ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 4 June 2020 – FU (Case C‑554/19) ( 1 ) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (EU) 2016/399 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] borders code – Articles 22 and 23 – Abolition of internal border controls in the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] area – Checks within the territory of a [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Measures having an effect equivalent to border checks – Identity checks in the vicinity of an internal border of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] area – Possibilities of checks irrespective of the behaviour of the person concerned or of the existence of specific circumstances – National framework concerning the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks) 1. Border controls, asylum and immigration – Community code on movement across borders – Abolition of border control at internal borders – Checks within the territory – National legislation conferring on the police authorities the power to check the identity of any person within an area of 30 kilometres from the land border of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] concerned with [OSCURATO:PERSONA] parties to the Convention implementing the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Admissibility – Conditions – Verification by the national court (Art. 67(2) TFEU; [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 2016/399, Arts 22 and 23) (see paras 26, 27, 38, 40, 53-57, operative part) 2. Preliminary rulings – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Examination of the compatibility of national law with EU law – Not included – Providing the national court with full guidance on the interpretation of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] law – Included (Art. 267 TFEU) (see paras 28-31) Operative part: Article 67(2) TFEU and Articles 22 and 23 of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (EU) 2016/399 of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of 9 March 2016 on a [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) must be interpreted as not precluding a national legislative provision which confers on the police authorities of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] in question the power to check the identity of any person, within an area of 30 kilometres from that [OSCURATO:PERSONA] land border with other [OSCURATO:PERSONA], with a view to preventing or terminating unlawful entry into or residence in the territory of that [OSCURATO:PERSONA] or preventing certain criminal offences which undermine the security of the border, irrespective of the conduct of the person concerned or the existence of specific circumstances, provided that that power is framed by sufficiently detailed specifications and limitations on the intensity, frequency and selectivity of the checks carried out, thereby guaranteeing that the practical exercise of that power cannot have an effect equivalent to border checks, which is, however, a matter for the referring court to verify. ( 1 ) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019 .