Corte di giustizia UE/2022

62017TO0612(20) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 17 February 2022 ( *1 ) (Rectification) [OSCURATO:PERSONA]612/17, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] LLC , formerly [OSCURATO:PERSONA]., established in [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), Alphabet, Inc ., established in [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by T. Graf, R. Snelders, C. Thomas, K. Fountoukakos-Kyriakakos, lawyers, R. O’Donoghue QC, M. Pickford QC, and D. Piccinin, Barrister, applicants, supported by Computer & [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , established in Washington, DC ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by J. Killick and A. Komninos, lawyers, intervener, v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , represented by T. Christoforou, N. Khan, A. Dawes, H. Leupold and C. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as Agents, defendant, supported by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Germany , represented by J. Möller, S. Heimerl and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents, by EFTA [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , represented by C. Zatschler and C. Simpson, acting as Agents, by Bureau européen des unions de consommateurs (BEUC) , established in Brussels (Belgium), represented by A. Fratini, lawyer, by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , established in Crowthorne ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), represented by A. Morfey, S. Gartagani, L. Hannah, A. D’heygere, K. Gwilliam, Solicitors, and T. Vinje, lawyer, by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , established in Paris (France), represented by J. Koponen and B. Meyring, lawyers, by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] eV , established in Berlin (Germany), represented by T. Höppner, professor, P. Westerhoff and J. Weber, lawyers, by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] GmbH , established in Berlin, represented by T. Höppner, professor, and P. Westerhoff, lawyer, by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] und [OSCURATO:PERSONA] eV, formerly [OSCURATO:PERSONA] eV , established in Berlin, represented by T. Höppner, professor, and P. Westerhoff, lawyer, and by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , established in Paris, represented by L. Godfroid, S. Hautbourg and S. Pelsy, lawyers, interveners, APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU, principally, for annulment of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2017) 4444 final of 27 June 2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] AT.39740 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA])), and, in the alternative, for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], L. Madise (Rapporteur), R. da [OSCURATO:PERSONA], K. Kowalik-Bańczyk and C. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 On 10 November 2021, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment in the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) ( T‑612/17 , EU:T:2021:763 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], it is necessary to rectify clerical mistakes found in paragraph 97 and in the header of that judgment. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: 1. Paragraph 97 of the judgment must be read as ‘By orders of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1007 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1008 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1009 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1010 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1011 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1028 ), and of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1029 ), the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] granted leave to intervene, respectively, to BEUC, Foundem, CCIA, VDZ, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA]. By three other orders dated 17 December 2018 he also granted leave to intervene to the EFTA [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Germany. In those orders, the costs related to the interventions were reserved.’ instead of ‘By orders of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1007 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1008 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1009 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1010 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1011 ), of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1028 ), and of 17 December 2018, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T-612/17 , not published, EU:T:2018:1029 ), the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] granted leave to intervene, respectively, to BEUC, Foundem, CCIA, VDZ, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], the EFTA [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Germany. In those orders, the costs related to the interventions were reserved.’. 2. The header of that judgment must be read as ‘[OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA])’ instead of ‘[OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Alphabet v [OSCURATO:PERSONA]’. Luxembourg, 17 February 2022. E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.