Corte di giustizia UEsentenza
Corte di giustizia UE/2024
ECLI:EU:C:2024:4
Testo integrale del provvedimento
Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62023CO0338_INF
Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 9 January 2024 –
(Bravchev) (
i
)
(Case C‑338/23) (
1
)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice – Interpretation of national law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction – Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
1.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Limits – Interpretation of national law – Precluded
(Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 53(2))
(see paragraphs 16, 17, operative part 1)
2.
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b) and (c))
(see paragraphs 18-23, 32, operative part 2)
Operative part
1.
[OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the fourth question referred by the Sofiyski gradski sad ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]), by decision of 25 May 2023.
2.
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sofiyski gradski sad ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) is manifestly inadmissible as regards the other questions referred by that court.
(
i
) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
(
1
)
OJ C 304, 28.8.2023
.