Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2024

ECLI:EU:C:2024:4
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62023CO0338_INF

Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 9 January 2024 – (Bravchev) ( i ) (Case C‑338/23) ( 1 ) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice – Interpretation of national law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction – Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

1. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Limits – Interpretation of national law – Precluded (Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 53(2)) (see paragraphs 16, 17, operative part 1)

2. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b) and (c)) (see paragraphs 18-23, 32, operative part 2) Operative part 1. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the fourth question referred by the Sofiyski gradski sad ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]), by decision of 25 May 2023.

2. The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sofiyski gradski sad ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) is manifestly inadmissible as regards the other questions referred by that court. ( i ) The name of the present case is a fictitious name.

It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings. ( 1 ) OJ C 304, 28.8.2023 .

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62023CO0338_INF Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 9 January 2024 – (Bravchev) ( i ) (Case C‑338/23) ( 1 ) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice – Interpretation of national law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction – Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility) 1. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Limits – Interpretation of national law – Precluded (Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 53(2)) (see paragraphs 16, 17, operative part 1) 2. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b) and (c)) (see paragraphs 18-23, 32, operative part 2) Operative part 1. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the fourth question referred by the Sofiyski gradski sad ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]), by decision of 25 May 2023. 2. The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sofiyski gradski sad ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) is manifestly inadmissible as regards the other questions referred by that court. ( i ) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings. ( 1 ) OJ C 304, 28.8.2023 .
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2024 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris