Corte di giustizia UE n. 1023/2020

62019CJ0382_INF Judgment of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 12 November 2020 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v EUIPO (Case C‑382/19 P) ( 1 ) (Appeal – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Official – Internal reorganisation of the services of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (EUIPO) – Redeployment – Article 7 of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Officials of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Covert penalty – Interests of the service – Equivalence of posts – Obligation to state reasons – Distortion of the facts – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Officials of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 1. Officials – Reorganisation of departments – Reassignment – Compliance with the principle of assignment to an equivalent post – Scope – Right to retain specific duties – None ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 7(1) and 45(1); [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1023/2013, recital 19) (see paras 50-52, 54, 55) 2. Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted – Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion – Requirement that the distortion be obvious from the documents in the file (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see paras 60-62, 65, 77, 79, 86) 3. Officials – Psychological harassment – Definition – Reassignement without evidence of misconduct – Precluded ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], Art. 12a(3)) (see paras 95-97) Operative part [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: 1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (EUIPO). ( 1 ) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019 .