Corte di giustizia UE/2016

62013CO0603 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 28 April 2016 ( *1 ) ‛(Rectification of a judgment’ [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C‑603/13 P-REC, APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], brought on 22 November 2013, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] SA , established in Alcobendas (Spain), Petróleos de Portugal (Petrogal) SA , established in Lisbon (Portugal), [OSCURATO:PERSONA] [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , established in Lisbon, represented by M. Slotboom, advocaat, and G. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], advogado, appellants, the other party to the proceedings being: [OSCURATO:PERSONA] , represented by C. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents, and by J. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], avocat, and G. Eclair-Heath, Solicitor, defendant at first instance, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of T. von Danwitz, President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], K. Lenaerts, President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as a Judge of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], D. Šváby (Rapporteur), A. Rosas and C. Vajda, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: N. Jääskinen, Registrar: A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], after hearing the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 On 21 January 2016, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) delivered the judgment in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Others v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑603/13 P , EU:C:2016:38 ). 2 That judgment contains, in its English-language version, a typographical error which it is appropriate for the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] to rectify of its own motion pursuant to Article 154(1) of its Rules of Procedure, which applies to the procedure on appeal under Article 190(1) thereof. On those grounds, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: 1. Paragraph 72 of the judgment of 21 January 2016 in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and Others v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑603/13 P , EU:C:2016:38 ) must be rectified as follows: ‘In that regard, as the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] has stated on many occasions, the scope of judicial review provided for in Article 263 TFEU extends to all the elements of [OSCURATO:PERSONA] decisions relating to proceedings applying Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU which are subject to in-depth review by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], in law and in fact, in the light of the pleas raised by the appellants (see, to that effect, judgments in KME Germany and Others v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], C-272/09 P , EU:C:2011:810 , paragraphs 102 and 109 ; Chalkor v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], C‑386/10 P , EU:C:2011:815 , paragraphs 62 and 82 ; and Telefónica and Telefónica de [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], C-295/12 P , EU:C:2014:2062 , paragraphs 56 and 59 ) and taking into account all the elements submitted by the latter, whether those elements pre-date or post-date the contested decision, whether they were submitted previously in the context of the administrative procedure or, for the first time, in the context of the proceedings before the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], in so far as those elements are relevant to the review of the legality of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] decision (see, to that effect, judgment in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], C-407/08 P , EU:C:2010:389 , paragraphs 87 to 92 ).’ 2. The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment. [Signatures] ( *1 )   Language of the case: English.