Corte di giustizia UE/2020

62019CJ0142_INF Judgment of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 18 June 2020 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v EUIPO (Case C‑142/19 P) ( 1 ) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for a declaration of invalidity of EU word mark PLOMBIR – Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Obligation to state reasons – Distortion of facts and evidence) 1. Appeal – Grounds – Mistaken assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted – Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Necessity of indicating precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and showing the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 168(1)(d)) (see para. 44) 2. Appeal – Grounds – Inadequate statement of reasons – Reliance by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on implied reasoning – Whether permissible – Conditions (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 36 and 53, first para.) (see para. 63) 3. Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the evidence duly produced – Inadmissible save when the clear sense of the evidence is distorted – Duty of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] to state the reasons for its assessment of the evidence – Scope (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 72) 4. Appeal – Grounds – Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support the operative part – Plea in law ineffective (see para. 92) Operative part [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: 1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] GmbH to bear its own costs and those incurred by [OSCURATO:PERSONA] GmbH; 3. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. ( 1 ) OJ C 263, 5.8.2019 .