Corte di giustizia UEsentenza
Corte di giustizia UE n. 207/2020
ECLI:EU:C:2020:886
Testo integrale del provvedimento
Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62020CO0304_INF
Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 29 October 2020 – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v EUIPO
([OSCURATO:PERSONA]304/20 P)
(Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
1.
Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Burden of proof
(Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 170b)
(see para. 11)
2.
Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed – Formal requirements
(Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 170a and 170b)
(see paras 12-14)
3.
Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that the issue is significant – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed
(Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 170a and 170b)
(see paras 15, 16, 21)
4.
EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion – Scope – Obligation to prove matters within common knowledge – No such obligation – Dispute before the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Submission of documents to demonstrate the accuracy of a well-known fact
([OSCURATO:PERSONA] 207/2009, Art. 76(1))
(see para. 17)
5.
Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Review by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Precluded
(Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 58, first para., and 58a; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 170b)
(see para. 18)
6.
Appeal – Preliminary admission scheme – Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Incompatibility with the case-law of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Request that the appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that the issue is significant – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed
(Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b)
(see para. 20)
Operative part
1.
The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
2.
[OSCURATO:PERSONA] shall bear its own costs.