Corte di giustizia UE/2012

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] [OSCURATO:PERSONA] [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 20 June 2012 ( * ) (Amicable settlement of the proceedings – [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 69(1) of the Rules of Procedure – Agreement between the parties at the initiative of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Removal from the register) [OSCURATO:PERSONA]64/11, ACTION brought under [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 106a thereof, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], member of the temporary staff of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by S. Crosby and S. Santoro, lawyers, applicant, v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented initially by J. Currall and P. Pecho, and subsequently by J. Currall, acting as Agents, defendant, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] [OSCURATO:PERSONA] makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 By application lodged at the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on 17 June 2011, the applicant seeks annulment of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] decision of 4 March 2011, by which the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] rejected the applicant’s complaint of 12 November 2010 against the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] decision of 5 October 2010, and compensation for damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of the adoption of that decision. 2 By letter of 14 March 2010, the Judge-Rapporteur, authorised to do so by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], put the terms of a possible amicable settlement of the proceedings to the parties. The applicant and the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] indicated their agreement to the amicable settlement thus proposed in their letters received at the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on 20 March and 29 March 2012 respectively. By letter received at the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] on 24 April 2012, the applicant informed the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of her agreement to the amount of costs to be borne by the defendant and proposed by the latter in its letter of 29 March 2012. 3 Accordingly, the agreement of the parties on the amicable settlement proposed by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] should be recorded and the present case removed from the register of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] pursuant to [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 69 of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA]. 4 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 69(3) of the Rules of Procedure, where there is an agreement between the parties as to costs, a decision as to costs is to be given in accordance with the agreement. The costs shall therefore be borne by the parties in accordance with the terms of their agreement. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] [OSCURATO:PERSONA] hereby orders: 1. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]64/11 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] shall be removed from the register of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA]. 2. The parties shall bear the costs in accordance with the agreement concluded between them. Luxembourg, 20 June 2012. W. Hakenberg M. I. Rofes i [OSCURATO:PERSONA] * Language of the case: English.