Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2025

ECLI:EU:C:2025:535
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62024CO0139_INF

Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 3 July 2025 – UY v Commission (Case C‑139/24 P) (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Comirnaty – COVID-19 vaccine – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

1. Appeal – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58a, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paragraphs 22-25)

2. Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Action brought by an applicant who is not an addressee of the contested act – Admissibility – Condition – Measure producing binding legal effects vis-à-vis the applicant – Commission decision granting a conditional marketing authorisation for a COVID-19 vaccine – Measure not bringing about a change in the applicant’s legal position – No interest in bringing proceedings (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paragraphs 37-43)

3. Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Direct concern – Criteria – Commission decision granting a conditional marketing authorisation for a COVID-19 vaccine – Applicant not directly affected (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paragraphs 56-67) Operative part 1.

The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

2. UY shall bear his own costs.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62024CO0139_INF Order of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) of 3 July 2025 – UY v Commission (Case C‑139/24 P) (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Comirnaty – COVID-19 vaccine – Action for annulment – Independence and impartiality of the Courts of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded) 1. Appeal – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Art. 58a, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see paragraphs 22-25) 2. Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Action brought by an applicant who is not an addressee of the contested act – Admissibility – Condition – Measure producing binding legal effects vis-à-vis the applicant – Commission decision granting a conditional marketing authorisation for a COVID-19 vaccine – Measure not bringing about a change in the applicant’s legal position – No interest in bringing proceedings (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paragraphs 37-43) 3. Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Direct concern – Criteria – Commission decision granting a conditional marketing authorisation for a COVID-19 vaccine – Applicant not directly affected (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paragraphs 56-67) Operative part 1. The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. 2. UY shall bear his own costs.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2025 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris