Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2019

ECLI:EU:C:2019:883
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62017CO0447

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA])

15 October 2019 ( *1 ) (Rectification of judgment) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C‑447/17 P-REC and C‑479/17 P-REC, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] under Article 56 of the Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], brought, respectively, on 25 July 2017 and 8 August 2017,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented initially by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, and subsequently by J. Inghelram, acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA], appellant, the other parties to the proceedings being:

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

established in Bertrange (Luxembourg), represented by C. O’Daly, Solicitor, and F. Louis, avocat, applicant at first instance,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and C. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA], defendant at first instance (C‑447/17 P), and

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

established in Bertrange, represented by C. O’Daly, Solicitor, and F. Louis, avocat, appellant, the other parties to the proceedings being:

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented initially by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, and subsequently by J. Inghelram, acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA],

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and C. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA], defendants at first instance (C‑479/17 P),

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]),

composed of R. Silva de [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Rapporteur), Vice-President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], J.-C. Bonichot and E. Regan, Judges,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]: M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA],

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]: A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA],

after hearing the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

1 On 5 September 2019, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) delivered the judgment

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

v

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑447/17 P and C‑479/17 P , EU:C:2019:672 ). 2 That judgment contains, in the version in the language of the case, a clerical mistake which it is appropriate for the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] to rectify of its own motion under Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], which applies to the procedure on appeal in accordance with Article 190(1) of those rules.

On those grounds, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders:

1. Paragraph 77 of the judgment of 5 September 2019, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑447/17 P and C‑479/17 P , EU:C:2019:672 ), shall be rectified as follows: ‘Whilst, since no domestic remedy lies against a judicial decision of a court adjudicating at last instance, an action for damages against the State is the only means of redress serving to ensure that the infringed right is restored and that effective judicial protection of the rights which individuals derive from EU law is thereby provided, the same does not apply as regards decisions of courts of first instance since a domestic remedy lies against them, and therefore infringements of EU law arising from those decisions may be corrected or put right.’

2. The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment.

A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment.

Luxembourg, 15 October 2019.

A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

R. Silva de [OSCURATO:PERSONA] as President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62017CO0447 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 15 October 2019 ( *1 ) (Rectification of judgment) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C‑447/17 P-REC and C‑479/17 P-REC, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] under Article 56 of the Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], brought, respectively, on 25 July 2017 and 8 August 2017, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented initially by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, and subsequently by J. Inghelram, acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA], appellant, the other parties to the proceedings being: [OSCURATO:PERSONA], established in Bertrange (Luxembourg), represented by C. O’Daly, Solicitor, and F. Louis, avocat, applicant at first instance, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and C. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA], defendant at first instance (C‑447/17 P), and [OSCURATO:PERSONA], established in Bertrange, represented by C. O’Daly, Solicitor, and F. Louis, avocat, appellant, the other parties to the proceedings being: [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented initially by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, and subsequently by J. Inghelram, acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and C. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as [OSCURATO:PERSONA], defendants at first instance (C‑479/17 P), [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of R. Silva de [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Rapporteur), Vice-President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], acting as President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], J.-C. Bonichot and E. Regan, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: M. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], after hearing the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 On 5 September 2019, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) delivered the judgment [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑447/17 P and C‑479/17 P , EU:C:2019:672 ). 2 That judgment contains, in the version in the language of the case, a clerical mistake which it is appropriate for the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] to rectify of its own motion under Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], which applies to the procedure on appeal in accordance with Article 190(1) of those rules. On those grounds, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: 1. Paragraph 77 of the judgment of 5 September 2019, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑447/17 P and C‑479/17 P , EU:C:2019:672 ), shall be rectified as follows: ‘Whilst, since no domestic remedy lies against a judicial decision of a court adjudicating at last instance, an action for damages against the State is the only means of redress serving to ensure that the infringed right is restored and that effective judicial protection of the rights which individuals derive from EU law is thereby provided, the same does not apply as regards decisions of courts of first instance since a domestic remedy lies against them, and therefore infringements of EU law arising from those decisions may be corrected or put right.’ 2. The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment. Luxembourg, 15 October 2019. A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] R. Silva de [OSCURATO:PERSONA] as President of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2019 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris