Torna alla ricerca
Corte di giustizia UEsentenza

Corte di giustizia UE/2019

ECLI:EU:T:2019:559
Testo integrale del provvedimento

Testo integrale del provvedimento

62015TO0673

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA])

3 September 2019 ( *1 ) (Rectification)

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑673/15,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

established in Bertrange (Luxembourg), represented by F. Louis, lawyer, and C. O’Daly, Solicitor, applicant, v

[OSCURATO:PERSONA],

represented by: (1) [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents, (2) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, acting as Agents, defendant, APPLICATION on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant because of, first, the length of the proceedings in the case giving rise to the judgment of 27 September 2012, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑82/08 , EU:T:2012:494 ), and, secondly, the infringement of the principle of equal treatment in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2007) 5791 final of 28 November 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] COMP/39165 — Flat glass) and in the judgment of 27 September 2012, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑82/08 , EU:T:2012:494 ),

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]),

composed of S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], I. Labucka, E. Bieliūnas (Rapporteur), V. Kreuschitz and I.S. Forrester, Judges,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA],

makes the following

[OSCURATO:PERSONA]

1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment on 7 June 2017 ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], T‑673/15 , EU:T:2017:377 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes found in paragraph 64 of that judgment.

On those grounds,

[OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA])

hereby orders: In paragraph 64 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, ‘… by virtue of abuse of process’ must be read instead of ‘… by virtue of misuse of powers’. Luxembourg, 3 September 2019.

E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA]

( *1 ) Language of the case: English.

Anonimizzato ex art. 52 D.Lgs. 196/2003
62015TO0673 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 3 September 2019 ( *1 ) (Rectification) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑673/15, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], established in Bertrange (Luxembourg), represented by F. Louis, lawyer, and C. O’Daly, Solicitor, applicant, v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by: (1) [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by N. Khan, A. Dawes and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents, (2) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by J. Inghelram and K. Sawyer, acting as Agents, defendant, APPLICATION on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant because of, first, the length of the proceedings in the case giving rise to the judgment of 27 September 2012, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑82/08 , EU:T:2012:494 ), and, secondly, the infringement of the principle of equal treatment in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C(2007) 5791 final of 28 November 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] COMP/39165 — Flat glass) and in the judgment of 27 September 2012, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑82/08 , EU:T:2012:494 ), [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA], I. Labucka, E. Bieliūnas (Rapporteur), V. Kreuschitz and I.S. Forrester, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment on 7 June 2017 ([OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], T‑673/15 , EU:T:2017:377 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes found in paragraph 64 of that judgment. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: In paragraph 64 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, ‘… by virtue of abuse of process’ must be read instead of ‘… by virtue of misuse of powers’. Luxembourg, 3 September 2019. E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.
Sentenza Corte di giustizia UE/2019 — Fons Iuris — Fons Iuris