Corte di giustizia UE/2020

62017TO0778 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 13 March 2020 ( *1 ) (Rectification) [OSCURATO:PERSONA] T‑778/17 REC, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] S.A., established in Poznań (Poland), represented by O. Geiss, D. Tayar and T. Siakka, lawyers, applicant, v [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by L. Armati, K. Herrmann and S. Noë, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by Republic of Poland, represented by B. Majczyna and M. Rzotkiewicz, acting as Agents, intervener, APPLICATION for rectification of the judgment of 24 October 2019, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑778/17 , EU:T:2019:756 ), [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] (Rapporteur), [OSCURATO:PERSONA], L. Madise and P. Nihoul, Judges, [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] delivered a judgment on 24 October 2019Autostrada Wielkopolksa v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( T‑778/17 , EU:T:2019:756 ). 2 In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], the parties having been given an opportunity to submit their written observations pursuant to Article 164(3) of those rules, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes or errors in calculation or obvious inaccuracies found in paragraph 66 of that judgment. On those grounds, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: In paragraph 66 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, is to be read as ‘Fourthly, the applicant cannot usefully argue that the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] only became aware of the electronic files relating to financial models after the opening decision.’ instead of as ‘Fourthly, the applicant can usefully argue that the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] only became aware of the electronic files relating to financial models after the opening decision.’. Luxembourg, 13 March 2020. E. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] S. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.