Corte di giustizia UE/2017

62015CO0164 [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) 16 February 2017 ( *1 ) ‛Rectification of judgment’ [OSCURATO:PERSONA] C‑164/15 P-REC and C‑165/15 P-REC, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] under Article 56 of the Statute of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of Justice of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], lodged on 9 April 2015, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], represented by L. Flynn, D. Grespan, T. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg, appellant, the other parties to the proceedings being: [OSCURATO:PERSONA], established in Dublin (Ireland), represented by K. Bacon and A. Robertson, QC, and by D. Bailey, Barrister, instructed by A. Burnside, Solicitor, applicant at first instance (C‑164/15 P) and intervener at first instance (C‑165/15 P), [OSCURATO:PERSONA], formerly [OSCURATO:PERSONA], established in Dublin (Ireland), represented by B. Kennelly, QC, I.-G. Metaxas-Maragkidis, dikigoros, and E. Vahida, avocat, applicant at first instance (C‑165/15 P), Ireland, represented by E. Creedon, J. Quaney and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, and by E. Regan, SC, and B. Doherty, BL, intervener at first instance (C‑164/15 P and C‑165/15 P), [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]), composed of L. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], M. Vilaras (Rapporteur), J. Malenovský, M. Safjan and D. Šváby, [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: P. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], [OSCURATO:PERSONA]: A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA], after hearing the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], makes the following [OSCURATO:PERSONA] 1 On 21 December 2016 the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) delivered its judgment in [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑164/15 P and C‑165/15 P , EU:C:2016:990 ). 2 That judgment contains, in its English-language version, a clerical error which it is appropriate to rectify, in accordance with Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA], applicable to the procedure on appeal pursuant to Article 190(1) of those rules. On those grounds, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ([OSCURATO:PERSONA]) hereby orders: 1. Paragraph 122 of the judgment of 21 December 2016, [OSCURATO:PERSONA] v [OSCURATO:PERSONA] and [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( C‑164/15 P and C‑165/15 P , EU:C:2016:990 ), in its English-language version, must be rectified as follows: ‘That said, it should be observed that, as is apparent from paragraphs 78 and 79 above, in circumstances such as those of the present cases, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] cannot refrain from finding that a case involves State aid on the sole ground that it is possible that the national courts with jurisdiction may order the repayment of the excess ATT to the airlines which did not have the benefit of the lower rate of ATT. As it was under a duty to establish the existence of State aid, the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] was also under a duty to order the recovery of that aid.’ 2. The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment. Luxembourg, 16 February 2017. A. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] L. [OSCURATO:PERSONA] of the [OSCURATO:PERSONA] ( *1 ) Language of the case: English.